10/25/2026
A LITTLE REFRESH FOR THOSE WHO ARE NEW HERE. (sorry for the length)
There seems to be a growing effort to place some of the blame for what is happening in these hills back on the residents and myself for choosing to live here. That we donât have a right to complain, like our taxes do not warrant the same rights as others because of the location of our property. Itâs the same bullying attempt to silence residence as we have seen time and time again. So, letâs go through this again for the people in the back and anyone who seems to be missing the point.
We purchased our home over 11 years ago. Today, it sits next to the former power plantâs brownfield site. When we first visited the property, Unit 5 was still operating. Of course, I had concerns, but we also knew the plant was being decommissioned.
So, I did what I tend to do: I researched the heck out of it.
Did you know you can actually call EPA agents and ask questions? Theyâre people doing a job, and I found many of them willing to talk through the risks and concerns with me.
We discussed downstream contamination risks, what fly ash is and how it can be used in other products, and air-quality monitoring near schools. I was shocked to learn that, at the time, WCCC had the worst air-quality readings in the area.
I also asked questions about the restrictions being placed on the site. I was informed of prohibitions on agriculture and another power plant, along with a 15-year testing requirement. These restrictions were also discussed by the company that demolished the plant, but they seemed to quietly disappear from the conversation when the Port Authority took possession of the property.
And because Iâm not exactly the most trusting person in the world, I didnât just take one personâs word for it. Iâd hang up and call someone else.
We purchased our home the same week the plant shut down.
When the demolition company arrived, they came straight to our door, introduced themselves, and gave us multiple cell phone numbers. When we called, someone answered.
Our concerns werenât brushed aside or minimized. During the explosions, they arranged for a state inspector to come to our door. When we had questions about potential impacts, the state placed sensors around our property and later provided the results directly to us.
I can honestly say that the out-of-state demolition company treated us professionally and considerately. They communicated with us, took our concerns seriously, and made an effort to keep us informed. That experience stands in stark contrast to what followed when our own Port Authority took over the property or this company became our âneighborâ. That is why I often say, it doesnât have to be this way.
You see, we didnât even know about the recent project until a realtor showed up at our house, we were dealing with life. Feeling guilty and pressured to sell, we reached out to the Port Authority ourselves. We wanted to know what was being planned.
If the property was going to be used for a warehouse or something similar, we figured they could do their thing on the other side of those trees, and we could continue living our lives on this side.
Seems reasonable, right? But no one would give us a straight answer.
Then came the offers. No contracts. And not enough money to replace our home.
Letâs be very clear about something:
I have never denied the choices we made when purchasing our property, and I have never claimed that living next to a former power plant automatically meant someone owed us a buyout but I will stand by my right to voice concerns because I am a tax paying American with rights and my location does not eliminate those rights.
THEY approached US with claims about how much they needed this property.
Then came the games, the attorney fees, and the stress of watching something that should have been a straightforward conversation turn into an unnecessarily confusing and exhausting situation.
There is a difference between accepting responsibility for a decision we made and accepting blame for decisions other people make about the property surrounding us, mainly government owned property, which is MY neighbor.
I own my decisions. I will not own theirs.
SO, WHERE DO THINGS STAND TODAY?
Iâm not sitting here waiting for an offer. Weâre making plans for a spring greenhouse setup, and we just redid our dining room. We are continuing to invest in our home. If they want us out, they know where to find us, they have our number.
Iâm not currently focused on getting an offer. But I am still paying attention and documenting.
And lately, Iâve noticed a disturbing pattern among officials.
When people ask questions, exercise their rights, and start digging into what is happening, they are met with attitude, defensiveness, and personal attacks.
Great leadership does not operate that way.
When people have questions, great leaders educate rather than attack. When questions are uncomfortable, they don't cop an attitude or stare at a desk. They engage in a conversation. They provide honest, straight answers. When one of their people get upset, a great leader deescalates the situation. They recognize that the people asking questions have just as much right to be there as anyone else. And they are choosing not to educate but to attack, dodge, or discredit (some of this was early on, you may have missed that delightful episode of local meetings).
Those behaviors belong to the people displaying them. Neither this community nor I am responsible for how a few individuals choose to react when they are questioned.
Ronald Reagan said in his farewell address, âWe the people tell the government what to do, it doesnât tell us.â
Our local culture sometimes seems to operate in the exact opposite direction.
I have said time and again that I donât want our leaders to be uncomfortable. We are in this together, even if they get to go home at the end of the day and forget about us in Waterford.
But being in this together does not mean excusing poor behavior. And it certainly does not mean accepting blame for someone else's decisions.
The new thing I have seen is publicly declaring that someone âdoesnât speak for Waterfordâ and they are missing the entire point.
The only people who should be speaking on behalf of Waterford are the people we are paying to represent us. And right now, weâre having a hard time hearing their voices when it matters most.
The rest of us? We can speak for ourselves. We can ask questions, raise concerns, share our experiences, and advocate for our families and neighbors. We don't need anyone's permission to exercise those rights.
And when someone jumps into the conversation with a clever comeback designed to discredit another person's voice or minimize their right to speak, it does nothing to solve the problem. It only adds to the growing perception that certain voices are welcome while others are expected to sit down and be quiet.
We're tired of that same old rerun.
And let me be clear about something: You don't have to agree with every criticism. You don't have to believe every allegation. You don't even have to oppose this development to recognize that the people living with its consequences deserve answers, respect, and a seat at the table.
I don't care whether you believe our officials are doing a good job or stand behind their position on this project. You should still be standing beside the community.
If you choose to dismiss those people, minimize their concerns, or help silence their voices, that's on you.
But don't confuse disagreement with a lack of rights, and don't confuse speaking up with pretending to speak for everyone.
Waterford doesn't need someone to decide who is allowed to have a voice. Waterford needs the people entrusted to represent us to finally use theirs on our behalf.
What I will take responsibility for is buying a home I researched extensively. I will take responsibility for the decisions my family made based on the information we had at the time.
And as for being bullied? Iâve never been very good at that. I will not be quiet, I will point it all out, my flaws included.
As for what I plan to do? I will continue writing about what is happening. I will continue documenting the progress and capturing footage as this project moves forward.
Because if this really is the best thing to happen to Washington County, then it deserves to be documented and witnessed.
I always have done that; I stood in Muskingum Park and watched the old Putnam Street Bridge come down. I understood the significance of that moment.
This development will become part of our history, too. It will become part of someone's legacy, whether we agree if that legacy will be positive or negative, we are about to find out.
The documentation will also preserve a record of what happened, and how the process unfolded should my neighbors or I ever need it for legal purposes.
But surely, if this is the best thing to happen to Washington County, none of that will ever be necessary.
Right?
Amber
Waterford Resident
The worst bullying victim ever.
*This is my personal opinion and doesn't reflect any organization