Diah

01/06/2026

Do you support?

31/05/2026

31/05/2026

TIME TO MAKE POLITICIANS ANSWER FOR EVERY TAXPAYER DOLLAR. 🇦🇺

30/05/2026

Should Australia have only one legal system for everyone?

Australia’s legal system is once again becoming a topic of heated national debate.

Some Australians believe the country should only operate under one legal framework — Australian law — and argue there should never be separate religious-based legal systems influencing decisions on family, marriage, or community disputes.✍️🌀

Others argue that religious mediation and faith-based community panels can coexist voluntarily within Australia’s legal system, as long as national law always remains supreme.

The issue continues to spark strong opinions about multiculturalism, religious freedom, national identity, and equal treatment under the law.

🇦🇺 What do you think?

❤️YES — Australia should only recognise one law for everyone.
👍NO — Religious community mediation should still be allowed within legal limits.

Share your opinion below 👇

29/05/2026

Hot topic on Aussie roads right now. With different road rules, driving on the left, and busy highways, should every visitor and new migrant prove they can drive here first?

YES 👍 = Make the test mandatory
NO ❤️ = International licence is enough

What do you think?

26/05/2026

Farmers get pennies. We pay $7 for lettuce.

Supermarkets import cheap food from overseas, then our Aussie farmers are forced off the land.

Should Australia stop relying on imported food and support our own?

❤️ AGREE = Buy Aussie
👍 DISAGREE = Imports keep prices down

25/05/2026

Australia’s healthcare system is already under pressure. 🇦🇺

Should migrants receive priority access to public healthcare in Australia?

❤️ YES — Healthcare should be available equally to everyone in need.
👍 NO — Australian citizens and taxpayers should come first.

Vote with your reaction and share your opinion in the comments. 👇🔥

24/05/2026

Should kids have mobile phones at school?
Yes❤️
No👍

24/05/2026

A major divide has erupted inside the Coalition over whether Australia should remain in the Paris climate agreement, exposing growing tensions over net zero, energy prices, and the nation’s international climate commitments.

Liberal Senator Alex Antic has broken ranks with Coalition leaders, declaring Australia “should walk out” of the Paris Agreement and follow the United States in abandoning the global climate pact.

Speaking to Sky News, Senator Antic rejected claims the agreement was merely symbolic, warning it has “real-world force” on Australian laws and policies.

“We should walk out. It's as simple as that,” he said.

Senator Antic argued international treaties can influence domestic legislation through constitutional powers and said governments were misleading Australians by downplaying the impact of such agreements.

“It’s a complete misnomer that the Paris agreement is just a piece of paper,” he said.

His stance puts him at odds with Opposition Leader Angus Taylor, who this week ruled out formally withdrawing from the Paris Agreement despite promising to scrap net zero policies.

Mr Taylor said leaving the agreement would not change the Coalition’s plans, insisting the focus should instead be on lowering energy prices and increasing energy supply.

“We will get rid of net zero,” Mr Taylor said.

“We’re not proposing to get out of the Paris Agreement because, frankly, it’s not going to change anything we’re going to do.”

Nationals leader Matt Canavan also stepped back from his previous support for leaving the accord, calling it a “symbolic gesture” and a distraction from bigger political battles.

“We don’t have time to waste on side quests,” Mr Canavan said.

The Nationals leader said the Coalition’s priorities should be scrapping net zero, building coal-fired power stations, cutting energy costs, and reversing Labor’s migration policies.

Mr Canavan also argued the Paris Agreement itself is not legally binding and claimed countries can remain part of the accord while still expanding coal and oil industries.

The clash highlights a growing internal debate within the Coalition over how far Australia should go in rejecting international climate policies while tackling the cost-of-living and energy crisis.